Justice Rights and The State Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Justice Rights and The State - Essay ExampleHowever, whilst Rawls acknowledges that the Justice as lividness model is rooted in Kants notion of autonomy Rawls argues that it is a mistake, I believe to try the place of generality and universality in Kants ethics.. it is impossible to construct a lesson theory on so slender a basis, and therefore to limit the discussion of Kants belief to these notions is to reduce it to triviality (Rawls, 1999, (ed) p.221).No one knows his place in society, his class position or accessible status, nor does anyone know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence, strength and the like. I shall even assume that the parties do not know their conceptions of the good or their special psychological propensities. The principles of justice are chosen goat a greater omentum of ignorance (Rawls, 1999 (ed), p.118).However, whilst Rawls theory of justice supports an element of the Kantian social contract philosophy Raw ls denounces Kants ideal of a cosmopolitan constitution under the cosmopolitan theory of justice and the focus of this write up is to critically evaluate Rawls theory in relation to the cosmopolitan theory of justice and provide a contextual critique of his philosophical model. To this end, I shall firstly evaluate the core elements of Rawls theory of justice and relatively analyse this with leading proponents of cosmopolitan justice theory.As highlighted above, Rawls theory of justice propounds the liberty and difference principle, which alters the classic model of the social contract by justifying social inequality within a distributive veil of ignorance justification.On this basis, Rawls veil of ignorance proposition suggests that individuals in a society will inherently demonstrate a propensity towards a system of equality, which mirrors Kants social contract theory. In